I recently came across this short unpublished article I wrote towards the end of 1996, reflecting on The Knutsford Lectures 1993-1996 on Visions of a New Renaissance, previously described in this post. It was an ambitious attempt to capture the spirit and outline of the needed New Renaissance, inspired by what the 19 individual speakers had said. The limitations of my perspective and the lack of suitable outlets meant the article was never published.
Discovering this piece led me to consider, what has changed in nearly 25 years. Was the outlined vision valid? Are we any nearer to it? Here’s my brief assessment, against the categories in the Emerging Vision section of the above paper i.e.:
- Sustainable ecology.
- Ethical behaviour and social responsibility
- Local economy and community
- Appropriate scale and human scale
- Open science
- Soul and spirit
- Love, compassion, nonviolence
- Holistic views
- Living philosophy
- Imagination, inspiration, arts
I have to say that, despite some encouraging features, it seems as if we are further away from a New Renaissance than we were 25 years ago. Consider just three points:
- Dominating everything else, the failure to effectively act on environmental sustainability and climate change for 25 years has led us into an increasingly perilous situation. We, particularly governments and moneymakers, have failed the test of ‘acting as if future generations matter’. On the other hand, far more individual people are acting as if they do; the pendulum is moving.
- Behind this is the dead weight of materialism, mechanism and reductionism, continuing to dominate science, governance and economics, stifling the emergence of soul, spirit, love, compassion, true values.
- The conflict between large scale and human scale is still heavily over-balanced in favour of the mega-projects, big government, industrial-scale farming and against human communities, particularly indigenous, and local solutions. Human inequalities increase as a result of an economic/governmental system that systematically increases them.
It does not have to be thus. We are creating the new world day by day, in our thoughts and resulting actions. The New Renaissance is a spur to our forward thinking. Take at look at SciMed‘s current New Renaissance initiative!
And I have to be encouraged by the direction taken by international organisations, and particularly the forthcoming Davos Agenda, plus this year’s schedule of global conferences. Covid-19 appears to have catalysed the understanding that the current ‘system’ no longer works, and a new direction is necessary for the whole of humanity, based on working with nature, inclusion and social justice, and trust between nations. A reason for hope!
Gosh, Barry, I hope you’re right that there’s reason to hope. It’s not always easy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hope is the thing with feathers
That perches in the soul
And sings the tune without the words
And never stops at all.
Attr. Emily Dickinson
LikeLiked by 1 person
I remember reading this manifesto some time ago and it would be wonderful to think we are moving in a positive forward direction.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Musings and Wonderings and commented:
Maybe this year the Davos attendees may actually do something.
LikeLiked by 1 person